Thread: Norton 360 Version 3.0

Norton 360 Version 3.0 – Web opinions

Feedback Strands* has analyzed opinions voiced on the web on Antivirus Norton 360 V3.0 during the period May 14, 2009 to July 5, 2009 by studying them on some web sites. This note is a brief summary of our observations – they are based on a sub set of opinions voiced and may not reflect a completely representative view of consumer opinions.

Consumers appear to have given “thumbs up” to Norton 360 V3.0 – the model received “Net Feedback” (% positive opinions - % negative opinions) score of 63. It received 74% positive opinions and 11% negative opinions. The rest were ambiguous opinions.

The most spoken about attributes appear to be feature (identity protection, backup utility), scanning ability, user interface, support, compatibility, update and installation process. Of these, attributes with most positive are installation, feature (backup utility), scanning ability, user interface, effectiveness, and support.

Norton 360 V3.0 antivirus is appreciated most for its installation as it was flawless, without any loss of function or speed. With Norton 360 V3.0, the identity protection feature works very well against online identity theft. Its backup capability is very useful and easy to use. Many find this antivirus to be of great help as it's extremely fast, reliable, has a tiny system footprint (memory usage) and with loads of features. Scans run quietly in the background without using too much memory or CPU and virus scan runs super fast. It does a fabulous job of keeping bugs off the systems, eradicating malware and viruses like nobody's business. The Norton 360 V3.0 does cover all aspects of the computer from internet security and virus protection to performance and networking. The interface is very user friendly with simple menus that explain everything. Once installed, a number of problem spots are found and tackled effectively. Technical support has improved a lot, it’s about as good as you can get.

There are also a few attributes with negative opinions like price, compatibility, etc. Norton is a bit more expensive - but not nearly as expensive as all the information and time lost due to a virus. Though it worked well with vista and Mozilla Firefox, but a few users did not find the antivirus to be compatible with some of their software.

On balance, Norton 360 V3.0 seems an appealing proposition.

*Feedbackstrands is a web portal that tracks opinions voiced on products and services on the web (blogs, reviews, discussion forums, social networking sites, ecommerce sites, etc). It analyzes them and presents it in a useful manner for firms. Please contact Feedbackstrands for meeting your unique needs.

My earlier exp with Nortan is not as good as is expected, but now, as you say it is modified and is being praised by all, I will definitely try it. Just wait for 20 days for my next post telling you my experience. Thanks for forwarding this useful information.